12th (?) Response To Preston

Linked below is this pitiful, what is perhaps, his 12th response to me.

https://donkpreston.com/responding-to-the-critics-the-overwhelming-imminence-in-romans-818f/?fbclid=IwAR0YYKMlYsdM9tQ27rO4aEmhFzL5tAemHTtqRdoiwLozx8kKBfPxUFUwEwk

Here linked is the original article I wrote against Preston:
https://www.hoperesurrected.com/2019/01/response-to-don-k-prestons-fullness-of.html

Nowhere in Preston's latest article, nor the previous ones before, does he ever address any of the points I wrote.

In debate we would call this a victory for Lazarus Conley. The opponent willingly gives no answer  & decides instead to continue running on rabbit trails.

No answer given. Literally just an advertisement for his book (which isn't the first time he's done this).

I explained multiple times in past articles in Conley's Blog why I didn't push Romans 8.

This is all a diversion tactic from Preston to not answer the points that were raised.

His article doesn't merit a response to be frank but alas here it is.

Til Preston bothers to answer questions that were raised (& he can't & won't) the debate's over.